Episode 4 -How to Leverage the Science of Learning and Development to Foster Robust Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning
Updated: May 31
It is in five parts, plus a short introduction to the episode. The discussions are with:
Mary Helen Immordino-Yang,
Stephanie Jones,
Annemaree Carol,
Jim Pellegrino, and
Carol Lee.
What also makes these conversations so important is that they bring together many of the leading scholars who have helped define, extend, and translate the science of learning and development across disciplines, institutions, and countries.You will hear from researchers whose work spans developmental psychology, neuroscience, learning sciences, cultural studies, educational policy, assessment, social-emotional development, and human flourishing.
Mary Helen Immordino-Yang, for example, is a professor of education, psychology, and neuroscience at the University of Southern California and founding director of the USC Center for Affective Neuroscience, Development, Learning and Education. Her groundbreaking work has transformed how we understand the relationship between emotion, meaning-making, reflection, civic reasoning, and deep learning.
Stephanie Jones, director of Harvard's EASEL Lab and faculty director of the Harvard Center on the Developing Child, has helped shape international understanding of social, emotional, and behavioral development and how learning environments can foster wellbeing and thriving from early childhood through adolescence.
Annemaree Carroll is the co-founder and head of the University of Queensland Learning Lab, where multidisciplinary researchers work in partnership with education and industry professionals to identify and address important learning and training priorities.
Her research has helped educators think more carefully about co-regulation, emotional climate, teacher well-being, stress, and the conditions that allow learning communities to function in healthy and sustainable ways. Her cutting-edge research also shows how classroom emotional climate can be measured and addressed in ways that have already improved outcomes for students in Australia.
Jim Pellegrino has been one of the central architects of contemporary learning sciences and assessment research. His work on deeper learning, transfer, adaptive expertise, and the design of meaningful assessment has influenced educational policy and practice around the world. He has chaired or co-chaired multiple National Academy of Sciences committees, including landmark studies on assessment, deeper learning, and educational practice.
Carol Lee, immediate past president of the National Academy of Education, has fundamentally reshaped how educators understand culture, identity, literacy, and intellectual development. Her pioneering work on cultural modeling helped establish the idea that the lived experiences and cultural practices young people bring into classrooms are intellectual resources for rigorous learning. She also co-edited both The Handbook of Cultural Foundations of Learning and the 2023 Review of Research in Education volume focused on the science of learning and development.
And while the first three episodes in this series were primarily U.S.-focused, the conversations that follow are intentionally both American and global in scope.That reflects an essential reality: the science of learning and development is not the work of any one discipline, institution, or nation. It is an evolving international conversation shaped by scholars, educators, and practitioners across the world.You will hear that global dimension reflected throughout this series in the scholarship of our guests, in examples drawn from multiple countries and cultures, and in the growing international dialogue around equity-centered thriving, human development, civic participation, and the future of education.That international conversation is also reflected in two webinars from the Global Science of Learning Network linked on the podcast website, as well as in the 2023 and 2025 volumes of the Review of Research in Education, which examine the implications of the science of learning and development and equity-centered thriving for schools, communities, and democratic societies.Together, these conversations invite us to think not only about how young people learn, but about what kinds of societies, relationships, and futures education can help create.
Please note that the transcripts are AI generated.
Introduction and context setting – David Osher
Part A – Mary Helen Immordino-Yang and Stephanie Jones
English Transcript
Part B- Stephanie Jones (in two parts)
Part C – Mary Helen Immordino
Part D – Annemaree Carroll
Part E – Jim Pelligrino & Carol Lee
References
References
Cantor, P., Darling-Hammond, L., Little, B., Palmer, S., Osher, D., Pittman, K., & Rose, T. (2020). How the science of learning and development can transform education: Initial findings (Updated May 2020).
Cantor, P., Osher, D., Berg, J., Steyer, L., & Rose, T. (2020). Drivers of human development: How relationships and context shape learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(1), 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2017.1398650
Carroll, A., York, A., Fynes-Clinton, S., Sanders-O’Connor, E., Flynn, L., et al. (2021). The downstream effects of teacher well-being programs: Improvements in teachers’ stress, cognition, and well-being benefit their students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 689628. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689628
Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3–10.
Immordino-Yang, M. H., Kundrak, C., & Street, K. (2026). When students think beyond the moment: Enhancing adolescents’ development by engaging their emotions. American Educator.
Jones, S. M. (2023). The science of learning and development: A translational and transactional science in service of human development and well-being. Review of Research in Education, 47(1), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X231220271
National Academy of Education & Equity Assistance Center-South. (2026, May 11). The foundations of supportive learning environments [Webinar]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/TLCl3Qkovxs
Rogoff, B., Turkanis, C. G., & Bartlett, L. (2001). Learning together: Children and adults in a school community. Oxford University Press.
Review of Research in Education. (2023). 47(1). SAGE Publications. https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/rrea/47/1
The Science of Learning and Development. (n.d.). In P. Cantor & D. Osher (Eds.), The science of learning and development. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9781003038016/science-learning-development-pamela-cantor-david-osher




When it comes to choosing useful digital tools, one clear example can stay with me longer than a long list of general points. A tool becomes useful when it makes a specific task easier rather than simply adding another option. The name Weiqikeji gives this theme a memorable reference point, while everyday technology skills keeps the subject in focus. A simple comparison would help me picture the differences without rushing towards a fixed answer. How would you compare two tools using the same everyday task?
Considering following curiosity through everyday information, I would want to understand a few concrete details before deciding what matters most. A clear question can turn a casual interest into something easier to explore. The name Soixoso gives this theme a memorable reference point, while Soixoso learning ideas keeps the subject in focus. That is the part I would keep thinking about after moving on to something else. How do you decide which detail deserves a closer look before moving on?
I keep coming back to the everyday side of creating welcoming community activities, where a simple detail can lead to a wider question. A small shared activity can help people contribute without needing to know everyone in advance. The name Foundedontruth gives this theme a memorable reference point, while community participation ideas keeps the subject in focus. I am still thinking through the practical side, because the context can change what seems useful. What would make an invitation easier for a newcomer to accept?
A discussion of understanding how public messages are received seems more useful when it connects an idea with something easy to picture. The same message can be understood differently by people with different expectations. That is why the connection between Echoreach and public relations communication makes me want to think through an example. That is the part I would keep thinking about after moving on to something else. How would you check whether a message says what its audience needs to know?
For me, making everyday business processes clearer becomes more engaging when there is room for questions as well as explanations. A simple record of responsibilities can prevent a task from being passed around without an owner. I would connect Dealerassets with practical business organisation through an ordinary example rather than a broad claim. I can imagine different responses depending on the situation, which makes the question more interesting. Which part of a routine process would you make clearer first?